Theoretical Physics

First uploaded on 2022/11/03
Last Updated on 2023/05/03
Copyright(C)2022 jos <jos@kaleidoscheme.com> All rights reserved.

When trying to understand natural phenomena, a so-called theoretical physics method is used when perfect observations of the phenomena are not possible. Theoretical physics, however, uses a unique way of thinking, and it may be difficult for the most people to understand it at first glance. The difficulty resides not in the treatment of mathematics or physics, but in the thinking procedure. The theoretical physics approach begins with a "hypothesis". The hypothesis may be a theorem inferred from current understanding, or it may be something completely out of the ordinary. Historically, many hypotheses were based on theorems that were far removed from the common knowledge of the time, such as "the speed of light has the largest constant value among all speeds", "the heat, temperature, and pressure of a gas are the statistical results of the motion of its constituent molecules", and "the Earth is spherical and orbits the sun". The important thing is the argument that follows. If the results logically derived from the hypothesis are consistent with actual phenomena, then whole the theory including the hypothesis must be accepted as possibly correct. Of course, the final confirmation must be made by observation of the actual phenomenon. This method of theoretical physics has advanced our understanding of phenomena that cannot be observed directly, and has driven science forward. If we had only looked at the unrealistic hypotheses and not discussed the subsequent arguments, we would still be unaware of the distortion of space-time due to mass/gravity, we would still be conducting experiments to extract the chemical element "caloric", and we would still be studying the ecology of the giant tortoise and elephants that support the Earth.

Radiatively Driven Circulation (RDC) theory begins with the hypothesis that the dynamical flows and forcing associated with the cumulus cloud are not involved in the transport from the interior to the exterior of the cumulus cloud. Most researchers refuse to discuss it here. It is because such a hypothesis is unacceptable given our experience with daily weather phenomena in which clouds are often accompanied by strong winds, and because it is incompatible with the idea of Dynamical Detrainment, which is currently believed to be the accepted wisdom. However, if the argument starting from this hypothesis is logically consistent to provide correct results, then the theory of RDC, including the hypothesis, should be accepted. So far, we have not been able to find the contradiction by ourselves. That is why we believe RDC is correct. If you are going to rehabilitate us who have strayed from the path of righteousness, please find a problem in our RDC theory, and publish it from your SNS account, on your own website, or on some scientific journal. It should stimulate discussion of RDC and lead to a better understanding of global warming. Sorry, but P2P discussions are not allowed.